Abstract:

People are developing environmentally friendly transportation solutions since fossil fuels are detrimental for the environment and there are concerns about future petroleum supplies. Biofuels must produce more energy than they use, be environmentally friendly, economically competitive, and produced in large quantities to be commercially successful. Without compromising food security or the environment. Lifecycle accounting allows us to compare biodiesel with maize ethanol using the above criteria. Biodiesel produces the same net energy as ethanol but less nitrogen, phosphate, and pesticide pollutants. Ethanol emits more per net energy gain than biodiesel. Biodiesel may be converted into fuel faster than ethanol and requires less land. The environment around biodiesel benefits greatly, hence the government should pay for it. If generated from waste biomass or low-input biomass grown on unsuitable farmland, synfuel hydrocarbons and cellulose ethanol may be more sustainable than foodbased biofuels. Waste biomass requires fewer resources than non-arable land.

Description:

CI Engine, Biodiesel, Nano Additives